Venue: The Council Chamber, Moorlands House, Stockwell Street, Leek. View directions
Contact: Sally Hampton - Democratic Services Officer Tel: 01538 395429 Email: sally.hampton@staffsmoorlands.gov.uk
Webcast: View the webcast
No. | Item | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chair's announcements a) Webcasting; b) Introductions of Members and Officers; c) Other announcements. Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair announced the following:
a) The meeting was being broadcast live to the internet via the usual webcasting facility and was capable of repeated viewing. The images and sound recording could be used for training purposes within the Council. The Chair had the discretion to terminate or suspend filming if it was his opinion that continuing to do so would prejudice the proceedings of the meeting. Any views expressed by any speaker in the meeting were the speaker’s own and did not necessarily reflect the views of Staffordshire Moorlands District Council. b) Members of the Committee and Officers present were introduced by the Chair. c) Members had made site visits during the morning of the meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minutes of the previous meeting Additional documents: Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting held on 8 June 2023, be approved as a correct record.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Urgent items, if any. Additional documents: Minutes: There were none. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest i. Disclosable Pecuniary Interests; ii. Other Interests; iii. Lobbying Interests. Additional documents: Minutes:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional documents: Minutes: RESOLVED: That the Late Representations report be noted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMD/2023/0132 - The Orchard, Springfield Drive, Leek Additional documents: Minutes: Erection of dormer bungalow, alterations and extensions to The Orchard and reconfiguration of site access to enable both dwellings to be accessed from Deebank Heights.
(Report recommended approval)
Received representation from the undermentioned speakers:
Against the application: Mr Ed Daly - Local resident Mr Jane Daly - Local resident
For the application: Mr Andrew Stock – Agent Mr John Hurst – Applicant
A letter of objection was read out by the Head of Development Services on behalf of Mr Keogh.
RESOLVED:
a. The proposal would represent an overbearing and dominant development, loss of trees, and harmful to the character and appearance of the area contrary to Policy DC1.
2. That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be given delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Applications Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.
(Proposed by Councillor Roberts and seconded by Councillor Johnson)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMD/2022/0458 - Woodland View, Gorsty Hill, Tenford Lane, Tean Additional documents: Minutes: Reserved Matters application seeking approval of the details of scale, layout, appearance and landscaping for the erection of 3no dwelling approved under outline application SMD/2019/0778.
(Report recommended approval)
Received representation from the undermentioned speakers:
Against the application: Mr Kevin Smith – Objector Mrs Tracy Smith – Objector Cllr Colin Pearce – Parish Councillor
For the application: Mr Rob Duncan – Agent
Discussion took place around the planning history of this site, parking spaces, land ownership, construction restraints, drainage and the scale/size of the proposed properties.
The Committee was reminded that this was a reserved matters application and that access to the site was not a material consideration.
RESOLVED:
1. That the Late Representations report be noted.
a. Overdevelopment of the site in terms of the scale/size and design of the properties, b. Impact on the amenity of nearby residents as there was insufficient parking and turning space for vehicles.
3. That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be given delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Applications Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.
(Proposed by Councillor Wilkinson and seconded by Councillor Roberts)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMD/2020/0502 - Land South of Thorley Drive, Cheadle Additional documents: Minutes: Outline planning permission with all matters reserved for residential development and associated works.
(Report recommended approval subject to conditions and the prior completion of a Section 106)
Received representation from the undermentioned speakers:
Against the application: Cllr Mike Haines – Ward Councillor Mr Anthony Joynes – Local resident Mr Matthew Machin – Local resident
For the application: Mr Thomas Hutchinson – Agent
Members debated the lack of infrastructure to support more housing in the area, alternative policies for the delivery of affordable housing and previous instances of the provision of affordable housing being scaled back after planning permission had been granted. The significant development of housing in Cheadle was acknowledged.
Officer advice was given as follows:- a) Housing land supply was calculated on a District wide basis b) Only 33% affordable housing could be secured in the Section 106 agreement in line with Policy H3 c) An e-mail from Staffordshire County Council on progress on the Tape Street junction improvement was read out d) Confirmation was given that the Education authority had advised that they were seeking a financial contribution to mitigate the impact of the development on local school infrastructure e) In the absence of a highway objection a reason for refusal on highway grounds would be difficult to sustain at appeal f) The NHS had been invited to comment. In the event of them seeking a contribution to mitigate impact on local health infrastructure then this could be secured in the Section 106
RESOLVED:
1. That the Late Representations report be noted;
a. The site was unallocated and in open countryside; b. Contrary to Policies SS2, SS3, SS4, SS10 and H1 c. Inadequate infrastructure in terms of education, health and highways.
3. That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be given delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Applications Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.
(Proposed by Councillor Roberts and seconded by Councillor Wilkinson) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMD/2022/0593 - Meadow Place Farm, Brookfields Road, Ipstones Additional documents: Minutes: Outline application (with details of access) for construction of a single dwelling to the rear of the existing house.
(Report recommended approval)
Received representation from the undermentioned speaker:
For the application: Mrs Karen Humphreys – Applicant
Letters of objection were read out by the Head of Development Services on behalf of Councillor Malyon and Mr & Mrs Hack.
RESOLVED:
1. That the application be APPROVED for the reasons and based on the policies contained within the report;
2. That the following informatives be added: a. constructed with materials to match the nearby Grade II listed building; b. a maximum height of the building to be stipulated by the Head of Development Services.
3. That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be given delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Applications Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.
(Proposed by Councillor Roberts and seconded by Councillor Flunder)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMD/2022/0391 - Garden to 'Outlands', 340 Cheadle Road, Cheddleton Additional documents: Minutes: Proposed detached 4 bedroom dwelling on land adjacent to 340 Cheadle Road.
(Report recommended refusal)
Received representation from the undermentioned speakers:
For the application: Mr Glen Shirley – Applicant Mr Andrew Dukesell -Agent Councillor Mike Worthington – Ward Councillor
Members questioned the conclusion that the application site lies outside of the village and requested that the application was deferred until the applicant had submitted a tree and biodiversity report.
RESOLVED:
1. That the Late Representation report be noted;
2. That the application be DEFERRED to enable the applicant to submit a tree and biodiversity report.
(Proposed by Councillor Roberts and seconded by Councillor Holmes) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMD/2023/0153 - Biddulph Town Hall, High Street, Biddulph Additional documents: Minutes: Alterations to the Town Hall Square in front of the Town Hall.
(Report recommended approval)
Received representation from the undermentioned speaker:
For the application: Councillor Nigel Yates – Biddulph Town Councillor
RESOLVED:
1. That the application be APPROVED for the reasons and based on the policies contained within the report;
2. That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be given delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Applications Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.
(Proposed by Councillor Flunder and seconded by Councillor Cawley)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMD/2023/0135 - Woodend Manor, Mill Lane, Wetley Rocks Additional documents: Minutes: (Having declared an interest, Councillor Pointon withdrew from the meeting during the consideration and voting on the following application)
Operational development following approval of application DET/2022/0043 (for change of use of agricultural building into two holiday lets).
(Report recommended approval)
Members commented on the modern design and how the building could encourage tourism in the area.
RESOLVED:
1. That the application be APPROVED for the reasons and based on the policies contained within the report;
2. That the following conditions be added: a. a scheme of landscaping and boundary treatment b. roof to be constructed with Staffordshire green roof material c. climate change mitigation measures to be incorporated into the scheme.
3. That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be given delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Applications Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.
(Proposed by Councillor Flunder and seconded by Councillor Roberts)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee considered an application which sought consent to fell six mature trees protected within Group G3 under Tree Preservation Order (TPO) No. LR.6, and to fell one mature tree and remove the crown from an early-mature tree both protected within Woodland W2 of TPO LR.6, subject to the conditions set out in this report.
RECOMMENDATION:
That consent be GRANTED to fell six mature trees protected within Group G3 under Tree Preservation Order (TPO) No. LR.6, and to fell one mature tree and remove the crown from an early-mature tree both protected within Woodland W2 of TPO LR.6, subject to the conditions set out in this report:
It was noted that the trees had been of some concern for a number of years and the officer was thanked for the advice he had provided in relation to re-planting. In response to a query around on-going inspection of trees, members were advised that this was the responsibility of the owner and not the Council.
RESOLVED:
The Committee granted consent to fell six mature trees protected within Group G3 under Tree Preservation Order (TPO) No. LR.6, and to fell one mature tree and remove the crown from an early-mature tree both protected within Woodland W2 of TPO LR.6, subject to the conditions set out in this report.
(Proposed by Councillor Flunder and seconded by Councillor Roberts)
|